Are the Richmond market numbers on this page current?
separate monthly source, geography and resource verification required.
The report system uses permanent URLs, accessible tables and data-driven charts that search engines and readers can interpret without relying on a report screenshot.

Concise, extractable answers first; evidence, definitions and property-level limitations follow below.
separate monthly source, geography and resource verification required.
860 occupied private dwellings were reported as single-detached houses in the 2021 Census profile (36%); 555 semi-detached houses represented another 24%. Keep property type, source geography, period and underlying counts visible before applying a rate or benchmark to one home.
A blank protects the geography and methodology. The site does not replace a missing community value with a Calgary-wide figure, estimate or inferred number.
No. A community statistic supplies context; site, effective age, condition, finish, documents and current alternatives determine how a subject property relates to that context.
Census population, household, tenure, dwelling-form and construction-period context
Open official source ↗02Find land titles, documents or plansGovernment of Alberta · accessed 2026-08-26Title, registered-interest and plan due diligence
Open official source ↗Official records provide dated community context. Current listing status and conclusions about one property still require the applicable live record and property documents.
These figures come from The City of Calgary, 2021 Census Community Profile: Richmond. They describe the named geography at a fixed reference date; current listings and monthly market conditions are kept separate.
Source: The City of Calgary, 2021 Census Community Profile: Richmond. Values are Census observations and may not total exactly because of rounding or source disclosure controls. Open the source ↗
860 occupied private dwellings were reported as single-detached houses in the 2021 Census profile (36%); 555 semi-detached houses represented another 24%.
Richmond’s largest reported construction cohort was 1960 or before with 645 occupied private dwellings (27%), followed by 2001 to 2010 with 400 (17%).
1,480 private households were reported as owner households (63%) and 880 as renter households (37%) in 2021.
Source: The City of Calgary, 2021 Census Community Profile: Richmond. Values are Census observations and may not total exactly because of rounding or source disclosure controls.
This page is ready for the next verified Richmond report. Community figures remain blank until the matching local source is imported—no Calgary-wide value is presented as a Richmond statistic.
| Property type | Benchmark | Absorption | Active | Sold | ADOM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Detached | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Semi-detached | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Row | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
| Apartment | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported | Not reported |
A Richmond reading should compare like with like, separating detached, attached and condominium property forms when those segments are present. A shift in one property form does not automatically describe the rest of the community.
Active listings, sales and absorption require the same geography, property type and period. Small Richmond samples can move sharply, so the underlying counts remain visible beside any rate.
Community indicators provide context; site, effective age, condition, finish, documents and competition determine how the subject property relates to that context.
A modelled reference for a defined property type and geography—not the expected sale price of a specific home.
Properties reported active under the source rules at the period cut-off. Current status still requires the live listing source.
Transactions counted by the licensed report definition for the named period, geography and property form.
A supply-and-sales relationship whose calculation, period and denominator must be stated before assigning a buyer, balanced or seller label.
Average days on market under the source methodology. It describes the reported set, not a guaranteed marketing time for an individual property.
separate monthly source, geography and resource verification required
The property decision still returns to the current listing record, the subject property and professional advice appropriate to the issue.
Receive the report and ask for property-specific context instead of relying on one headline number.
A Richmond reading should compare like with like, separating detached, attached and condominium property forms when those segments are present. A shift in one property form does not automatically describe the rest of the community.
Active listings, sales and absorption require the same geography, property type and period. Small Richmond samples can move sharply, so the underlying counts remain visible beside any rate.
Community indicators provide context; site, effective age, condition, finish, documents and competition determine how the subject property relates to that context.
A modelled reference for a defined property type and geography—not the expected sale price of a specific home.
Properties reported active under the source rules at the period cut-off. Current status still requires the live listing source.
Transactions counted by the licensed report definition for the named period, geography and property form.
A supply-and-sales relationship whose calculation, period and denominator must be stated before assigning a buyer, balanced or seller label.
Average days on market under the source methodology. It describes the reported set, not a guaranteed marketing time for an individual property.
separate monthly source, geography and resource verification required
The property decision still returns to the current listing record, the subject property and professional advice appropriate to the issue.
Richmond is an inner-city market where established housing, renovation and redevelopment can create distinct comparison sets on neighbouring streets. This record turns the community file into route-specific work while keeping the subject property and current professional advice separate.
860 occupied private dwellings were reported as single-detached houses in the 2021 Census profile (36%); 555 semi-detached houses represented another 24%. For this monthly market reading, use that evidence to define which property segment a monthly statistic could reasonably describe. Read it beside: Identify address-specific water, drainage, slope, noise, traffic, construction, fire, environmental or insurance questions relevant to the Richmond property; do not generalize an exposure to every home. Comparison checkpoint: Killarney/Glengarry. Compare another nearby inner-city market with established homes, infill and attached options; keep lot, build quality and the exact block aligned. Current listing status still belongs to the approved live record.
Lead with the real differentiators of the Richmond property: site, effective age, documented improvements, layout, ownership structure and immediate setting. Applied to the monthly market reading, the evidence helps separate the fixed housing baseline from current listing and sales activity. Read it beside: Community research and publication verification. Publisher record: source verification pending. Comparison checkpoint: South Calgary. Compare a nearby mixed-form search with central access, redevelopment and condominium options; verify the property and ownership structure separately. Condition and legality still require the documents and review appropriate to the property.
The profile counted 5,250 people in private households across 2,360 households, with an average household size of 2.2 people. Within the monthly market reading, its job is to identify which subject-property differences could make a community headline misleading. Read it beside: Compare a planned inner-city alternative with distinct architectural, attached-home and condominium contexts. Comparison checkpoint: Garrison Woods. Compare a planned inner-city alternative with distinct architectural, attached-home and condominium contexts. A lender or mortgage professional must decide how the actual property affects financing acceptance.
Identify address-specific water, drainage, slope, noise, traffic, construction, fire, environmental or insurance questions relevant to the Richmond property; do not generalize an exposure to every home. The monthly market reading should use this record to keep price positioning connected to the home's actual site, condition and alternatives. Read it beside: Do not promise a fixed travel time; route, traffic, weather, destination and time of day materially affect the trip. Comparison checkpoint: Altadore. Compare a neighbouring southwest market with a broad detached, infill and attached-home search; current alternatives and site conditions still require separate review. Community context cannot establish value for the subject home.
Census population, household, tenure, dwelling-form and construction-period context. Publisher record: The City of Calgary. Here, the practical use is to record the required geography, period, definition and source before publishing a number. Read it beside: South Calgary — Compare a nearby mixed-form search with central access, redevelopment and condominium options; verify the property and ownership structure separately. Comparison checkpoint: Killarney/Glengarry. Compare another nearby inner-city market with established homes, infill and attached options; keep lot, build quality and the exact block aligned. A named source supports only the claim and geography recorded for it.
Compare another nearby inner-city market with established homes, infill and attached options; keep lot, build quality and the exact block aligned. Carry this into the monthly market reading to test whether a nearby comparison area belongs in the same buyer alternative set. Read it beside: Compare the exact Richmond parcel for dimensions, orientation, grade, access, easements and neighbouring context; the community profile does not describe those property-level attributes. Comparison checkpoint: South Calgary. Compare a nearby mixed-form search with central access, redevelopment and condominium options; verify the property and ownership structure separately. A comparison relationship does not make two properties or communities equivalent.
2,510 residents aged five and older had moved within the prior five years (51%); that is household-mobility context rather than a proxy for real estate turnover. For the monthly market reading workflow, use it to keep daily-life appeal outside the calculation unless current evidence supports the connection. Read it beside: Lead with the real differentiators of the Richmond property: site, effective age, documented improvements, layout, ownership structure and immediate setting. Comparison checkpoint: Garrison Woods. Compare a planned inner-city alternative with distinct architectural, attached-home and condominium contexts. Historical evidence must not be presented as current inventory or operating status.
Which Richmond property form, ownership structure and completion stage fit the intended use and budget? The next step in the monthly market reading is to turn the series into a property question rather than a prediction of value. Read it beside: The profile counted 5,250 people in private households across 2,360 households, with an average household size of 2.2 people. Comparison checkpoint: Altadore. Compare a neighbouring southwest market with a broad detached, infill and attached-home search; current alternatives and site conditions still require separate review. The paired records define the next question; they do not settle the property conclusion.
Each route has a separate job. Follow the evidence from community context to the specific property instead of repeating the same article under another keyword.
Put monthly activity beside Richmond's dated dwelling-form and construction-period context.
Continue →02Use the infill guide to understand why unlike properties can move differently inside one reporting period.
Continue →03Build a launch recommendation from the subject home and its current alternatives—not from one community headline.
Continue →Call Dusko and Real Estate Partners for a private buyer, seller or property-specific conversation.