What evidence supports the Richmond community profile?
The guide uses the exact named 2021 official profile for historical community context. It does not treat that profile as current inventory, price or evidence about an individual property.
2021 Census community profile
Who lives in Richmond—and what the data can actually tell us.
Population, household, tenure and mobility context from the official City profile, separated from assumptions about an individual buyer, seller or property.
Direct answers
Richmond, answered before the long read.
Concise, extractable answers first; evidence, definitions and property-level limitations follow below.
What does the Richmond housing profile show?
860 occupied private dwellings were reported as single-detached houses in the 2021 Census profile (36%); 555 semi-detached houses represented another 24%.
When was much of the occupied Richmond housing stock built?
Richmond’s largest reported construction cohort was 1960 or before with 645 occupied private dwellings (27%), followed by 2001 to 2010 with 400 (17%).
Does community data describe every Richmond resident or home?
No. Historical aggregate data describes the named geography at its reference date; it cannot establish a person's circumstances or a property's current condition, price or suitability.
Official referencesCity of Calgary and government records used for local context2 references +
012021 Census Community Profile: RichmondThe City of Calgary · accessed 2026-08-26
Census population, household, tenure, dwelling-form and construction-period context
Open official source ↗02Find land titles, documents or plansGovernment of Alberta · accessed 2026-08-26Title, registered-interest and plan due diligence
Open official source ↗Official records provide dated community context. Current listing status and conclusions about one property still require the applicable live record and property documents.
A factual base—not neighbourhood mythology
Richmond by the numbers.
These figures come from The City of Calgary, 2021 Census Community Profile: Richmond. They describe the named geography at a fixed reference date; current listings and monthly market conditions are kept separate.
Source: The City of Calgary, 2021 Census Community Profile: Richmond. Values are Census observations and may not total exactly because of rounding or source disclosure controls. Open the source ↗
Households and mobility
A community snapshot with the reference year attached.
The profile counted 5,250 people in private households across 2,360 households, with an average household size of 2.2 people.
16% of the population was age 14 or younger, 11% was age 65 or older, 22% were immigrants. These figures describe Richmond at the 2021 Census reference date and should not be read as a prediction of who will buy a particular home.
Across 2,360 private households, median total household income before tax was $113,000 in 2020; this is demographic context, not a measure of current purchasing power or home value.
2,510 residents aged five and older had moved within the prior five years (51%); that is household-mobility context rather than a proxy for real estate turnover.
1,315 members of the employed labour force used driver – car, truck or van as their main commute mode (75%), while 830 reported the most common duration, 15 to 29 minutes (47%).
Occupied dwelling structure
The housing mix in Richmond.
Categories and shares are reproduced as structured HTML so readers and search engines can interpret them without reading a chart image.
Period of construction
When the occupied housing stock was built.
Construction period guides inspection planning; it does not establish the effective age or condition of a particular home.
Source: The City of Calgary, 2021 Census Community Profile: Richmond. Values are Census observations and may not total exactly because of rounding or source disclosure controls.
Community evidence brief
A fuller Richmond foundation.
Richmond is an inner-city southwest Calgary community where established detached houses, semi-detached properties, infill and apartment ownership create several distinct search paths. In the official 2021 Census profile, single-detached houses represented 36% of occupied private dwellings and semi-detached houses represented 24%, while the construction-period distribution extended from pre-1961 housing through recent redevelopment. Buyers should separate land and site value, effective age, documented improvements, ownership form, parking and the immediate block before comparing price. These historical figures describe the community profile, not current inventory or an individual home; current status, condition, title, permits, school designation and travel time remain address-specific.
How to read this brief
Exact community-profile evidence is used for this guide. Historical Census context, current listing status and address-specific property evidence remain separate layers.
Historical community evidence, current listing status and address-specific property records remain separate layers throughout the guide.
See sources and methodology →Define the geography before describing the property.
Boundary discipline
- Confirm the exact Richmond boundary and the listing's community field against the current municipal map or address record before publication.
- Describe nearby services as nearby rather than inside the community unless the mapped boundary and current source support that wording.
Development and housing history
- 27% of occupied private dwellings were reported in the 1960 or before construction cohort; the Census figure does not establish the age of a current listing.
- 17% of occupied private dwellings were reported in the 2001 to 2010 construction cohort; the Census figure does not establish the age of a current listing.
- 15% of occupied private dwellings were reported in the 2011 to 2015 construction cohort; the Census figure does not establish the age of a current listing.
- 14% of occupied private dwellings were reported in the 1961 to 1980 construction cohort; the Census figure does not establish the age of a current listing.
Different contexts inside the community
- Compare interior streets with route-, park-, amenity-, employment- or edge-adjacent locations where those conditions exist at the exact address.
- Separate site and immediate-block conditions from a broad community label; view, noise, access, privacy, construction and land-use context can change within a neighbourhood.
Continue with purpose
The next useful layer of the Richmond decision.
Each route has a separate job. Follow the evidence from community context to the specific property instead of repeating the same article under another keyword.
01
Translate data into questions
Turn structure type and construction period into a property-specific comparison and inspection plan.
Continue →02Infill guide
Two nearby addresses can belong to different physical, legal and buyer comparison sets.
Continue →03Add daily-life context
Check current parks, services, schools and routes separately from the fixed Census reference date.
Continue →